20260613

Experiential Calvinism Part 2

Archibald Alexander
(Otis, Bass, 1784-1861. (artist), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons)


The error of faing to get to know the Bible
The first area where the Sadducees were in error was in their failure to read their Bibles properly. They made at least two particular errors in regard to the Bible.
First, they only accepted the Books of Moses, the first five books of the Bible, as being God's Word. They rejected the prophets and the writings that form the rest of the Old Testament.
Then, even the parts of the Bible that they accepted, they did not read anywhere near carefully enough. Jesus highlights the phrase I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, a phrase that comes up many times and that the Sadducees would have known well. However, they had never really thought about it. As Jesus points out, if God is the God not only of Jacob but also of Isaac and Abraham who were dead before Jacob then he is the God of … the living … not the dead. They were badly mistaken!
So first of all, we must accept the whole of the Bible – not just the Books of Moses but the rest of the Old Testament too; not just the Old Testament but also the New. Not just the Gospels but the rest of the New Testament too.
The Bible is really a whole library of books and it is all important. Everywhere you look you will find something about Jesus in it and so, bit by bit, we need to get to know this library and understand what these books say about Jesus. It will not come overnight. It needs to be worked at.
And then do not make the mistake of failing to read it with great care.
To give examples. In the same chapter (Mark 12:36, 37) Jesus quotes Psalm 110 and says David himself, speaking by the Holy Spirit, declared: "'The Lord said to my Lord: "Sit at my right hand until I put your enemies under your feet."' He then says David himself calls him 'Lord.' How then can he be his son? … He wants people to think about how Messiah can be David's son and his Lord.
In his first letter Peter, speaking to wives, notes that (1 Peter 3:6) Sarah … obeyed Abraham and called him her lord. He then says to wives You are her daughters if you do what is right and do not give way to fear. You would have to read Genesis fairly carefully to spot that Sarah called Abraham Lord and then to consider the implications.
In Hebrews 8:13 the writer refers to Jeremiah 31:31 where it speaks of God making a new covenant. He says By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.
In Galatians 3:16 Paul says The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say "and to seeds," meaning many people, but "and to your seed," meaning one person, who is Christ. So Paul is drawing attention to just one letter difference to make a point.
C H Spurgeon once said of John Bunyan “Prick him anywhere, his blood is Bibline, the very essence of the Bible flows from him. He cannot speak without quoting a text, for his very soul is full of the Word of God.”1 We all need to get the Bible into our heads so that it shapes our thinking and our words and actions too.

The error of failing to reckon with the power of God
The other thing Jesus says about the Sadducees is that they are in error not only because they did not know the Scriptures but also because they failed to reckon with the power of God.
Avoiding error is not simply a matter of getting a Bible and reading it. You see that, for example, with cults such as the so called Jehovah's Witnesses or Christadelphians. They love their Bible studies, as they call them, but have no idea of God's power. Similarly, there are academics with a very good working knowledge of the Bible but no idea of God's power in their lives.2
Yet it is something absolutely vital to know. For example, it is important to know God's power to convert a person. Many deny it but it is true that God has power to transform a person's life, to turn it around so that it can fairly be said they are born again; they are new people in Christ.
The most famous conversion is that of Saul of Tarsus on the road to Damascus. He is suddenly confronted by Jesus himself and powerfully converted. Similar things have gone on ever since. In recent years conversions have included those of Mosab Hassan Yousef, a former terrorist whose father co-founded Hamas in Palestine; Bilquis Sheikh, a Pakistani Muslim; Helen Shapiro the singer, brought up in London's east end in a Jewish family; Guillaume Bignon, who grew up as an atheist in France;3 American Becket Cook who had been a practising homosexual. He wrote
It wasn’t about simply changing my mind, but about changing my mind and heart. I can’t explain all the mechanics of this radical transformation. I just know that no one can be in the very presence of the living God and remain the same.4
God's power is not something only experienced in conversion. It goes on sanctifying the believer and making them more and more holy. Prayer, perhaps, is an obvious example of where God's power is known in a person's life. In many cases, people have prayed and quite remarkable answers have been known. People have been healed, situations have been transformed. Other example would be in the areas of conviction, joy in suffering and assurance. In all sorts of ways real Christians are those who daily experience God's power in their lives.
This is the thing to keep in mind – keep reading the Bible and never forget God's power. Pray for it in your life. Have a head full of the Bible and its great doctrines and a heart full of love to God as you trust in his power. That is the sort of Experiential Calvinism the Bible encourages.5

1 See C H Spurgeon, Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit Volume 45, Luke 23:46, June 25, UK, 1882
2 The late Eta Linneman describes how, as a theologian, she was taught to study the Bible “as if there were no God”. She says “Although it can happen that when you study the Bible like that, you might experience something of him, in general, you have not the slightest chance of finding God this wa. … If you decide to study as if there were no God, you will not meet him.” https://gracevalley.org/teaching/eta-linnemann-testimony/ Accessed November 2025.
3 Mosab Hassan Yousef, R Brackin, Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices, USA, 2011; Bilquis Sheikh, R H Schneider, I Dared to Call Him Father: The Miraculous Story of a Muslim Woman's Encounter with God, USA, 2003; Helen Shapiro, Wendy Green, Walking back to happiness, an autobiography, UK, 1994; Guillaume Bignon, Confessions of a French Atheist: How God Hijacked My Quest to Disprove the Christian Faith, USA, 2022,
4 Becket Cook, A Change of Affection: A Gay Man's Incredible Story of Redemption, USA, 2019
5 Helpful books on Christian experience include Archibald Alexander's masterful Thoughts on Religious experience, Banner of Truth reprint 1968 and two little books by the late Erroll Hulse, The Believer's Experience: maintaining the balance been experience and truth, UK, 1977 and Crisis experiences, UK, 1984.

Experiential Calvinism Part 1

Gilead Calvinistic Methodist Chapel by N Chadwick, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>,
via Wikimedia Commons

This article first appeared in The Banner of Truth Magazine

Experiential Calvinism – Knowing the Bible and the Power of God
The biggest Protestant grouping in Wales in the 19th century was the Calvinistic Methodists, in Welsh, Methodistiaeth or more rarely Trefnyddion Calfinaidd. (Calvinist as opposed to Wesleyan, as Arminian Methodists are styled in Wales.) It was a grouping that Dr Martyn Lloyd-Jones knew well. By his time, it was no longer in its heyday but he was happy to identify as a Calvinistic Methodist. Far from being the oxymoron some consider it, for him, it neatly summed up what he sought to promote - sound theology allied to deep Christian experience of God.
He once said that he spent half his time urging Christians to study doctrine and the other half telling them that doctrine is not enough. Speaking once about Calvinistic Methodist preacher and hymn writer William Williams, he said
My argument is, that cold, sad, mournful, depressing Calvinism is not Calvinism at all. It is a caricature; something has gone wrong somewhere. It is mere intellectualism and philosophy. Calvinism leads to feeling, to passion, to warmth, to praise, to thanksgiving. Look at Paul, the greatest of them all. We should not talk about 'Calvinism'; it is Paul's teaching. He tells us that he wept. He preached with tears. Do you? When did we last weep over these matters? When did we last shed tears? When have we shown the feeling and the passion that he shows? Paul could not control himself, he got carried away. Look at his mighty climaxes; look at the way in which he rises to the heavens and is 'lost in wonder, tore, and praise'.1
In a similar way, like others, I happily identify as a Reformed Baptist. The word Reformed there is interchangeable with Calvinistic and the word Baptist points not simply to a certain view of baptism but also to a very practical, enthusiastic and evangelistic approach to Christian living. Some do not like the name but, for others, it sums up well where we stand.

Experiential Calvinism
Similar to these terms is Experiential Calvinist, which has become popular in some circles in more recent years,2 overtaking the experimental religion spoken of by former generations, a phrase that someone like Jonathan Edwards would have readily used.3 The phrase usefully asserts that, as to doctrine, this person is a Calvinist, someone committed to the doctrines of grace, but not in a cold or merely theoretical way but warmly and passionately, in an experimental or experiential way.
In the history of the church, there have been professing Christians convinced that if you are going to be a Christian and live for God's glory, you must be experiential. 2 Timothy 3:5 speaks of people who Christians must avoid, as those with a form of godliness but who deny its power (my emphasis). Other Scriptures point to the same phenomenon.4 Such people do not want to be like that. They want to experience God in their lives. However, too often such people have sat light to what the Bible says and so have strayed into unbiblical ways of thinking and acting.
In many ways, that is the story of the Quakers. They call themselves the Society of friends but long ago gained the nickname Quaker as, in the early days, many would literally quake or shake as they worshipped God. Some extraordinary things happened among the Quakers in the early days but they drifted further and further from the Bible and it must be very rare today to find someone who is who is both a Quaker and a real believer. The Charismatic movement has had a similar, though less disastrous, trajectory. It is another example of a movement where the emphasis on Christian experience can become more important than what the Bible actually teaches.
It is very important to seek real Christian experience but it is important to always keep coming back to the Bible so that our thinking and life are shaped by it. The Bible must interpret our experience – not the other way round.
Erroll Hulse has written
A clear line of division can be drawn between those who insist that the Bible must be the basis by which all spiritual experience is tested and those who regard experience as pre-eminent and resist the tests of Scripture. Is the Word our authority, or is spiritual experience our authority? The Puritans were strong in the area of knowing God by heart experience but they sought to test everything by Scripture. We do well to follow their example.5
Anglican Bishop Handley Moule was making a similar point when he quoted someone warning against “an untheological devotion”. Moule underlines how, in Colossians, Paul asks for “just these ‘theological’ blessings … for a salvation nobly ‘theological.’” Moule says, “He prays that they may not only be warm and earnest, but may know profoundly the reason of their hope.”6
Unlike those for whom experience is everything for some the need to conform to the Bible has become so important that they have almost forgotten about the importance of Christian experience. It is easy to fall into and is probably the bigger danger for those who know their Bibles well.
The question is sometimes asked whether it is better for a soccer player to be able to kick with their right foot or their left? Of course, it is best if they can kick with both. At all levels, the two footed player is more versatile, more unpredictable and better balanced all round.
Do not make the mistake of thinking that the Bible is enough. Keep coming back to it so that your thinking and life is shaped by it but also look for real Christian experience in your life. The Bible is to be lived out not just held in our heads.
To quote Lloyd-Jones again, “As theology is ultimately the knowledge of God, the more theology I know, the more it should drive me to seek to know God.”7 Knowing God is what it is all about not just knowing about God or what is in the Bible. A quotation often attributed to Puritan John Owen says
The foundation of true holiness and true Christian worship is the doctrine of the gospel, what we are to believe. So when Christian doctrine is neglected, forsaken, or corrupted, true holiness and worship will also be neglected, forsaken, and corrupted.8
There is a famous line in a hymn by Joseph Hart that says it well

True religion’s more than notion;
Something must be known and felt.

A biblical idea
An obvious question for experiential Calvinists is whether this is a biblical idea. It certainly is. 2 Timothy 3:16, 17 and Hebrews 4:12 would certainly point in that direction but Mark 12:24 is a clincher. It says Jesus replied, Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God? He is speaking to a group of people called Sadducees. In Acts 23:28 we read that they claimed there is no resurrection, and that there are neither angels nor spirits, unlike the Pharisees who believed all these things.
Mark tells how some Sadducees came to Jesus in the week before his death in Jerusalem and told him a rather ridiculous story. It is about a woman who marries a man who dies. There are no children so the man's brother is obliged to marry the widow, the first child they have then counting as his dead brother's child. The woman remarries but the second brother also dies with no children and, in fact, the woman marries a whole series of seven brothers, all of whom die without issue! Eventually, the woman herself dies.
A crazy story, not real and unlikely to happen but its purpose is to ridicule an idea. The Sadducees, the great sceptics of their day, want to make fun of the whole idea of the afterlife, the resurrection, the idea that everyone is raised up at the end of time and goes to heaven or hell. If it is true, they argue, then in this case there is a real problem. At the resurrection whose wife will she be, since the seven were married to her? (Mark 12:2
Jesus shows that, in fact, the question they thought so very clever has no power in fact and is rather silly. He explains (12:25) When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven. The world to come is a very different one. In that place and time, all believers will be brothers and sisters, There will be no marriage or any such thing.
Jesus adds that if the Sadducees had read their Bibles properly, they would have avoided this mistake. He points out how in the Book of Moses, that is in the first five books of the Bible which they agreed was inspired (Exodus actually) in the account of the burning bush ... God said to him to Moses, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? Jesus concludes He is not the God of the dead, but of the living. You are badly mistaken! This is God's character – he is the living God, the great I am.
This is the context for Mark 12:24 and its assertion that the Sadducees are in error because they do not know the Scriptures or the power of God. Jesus could have said more, no doubt, but he says these two failures are at the heart of where the Sadducees have gone wrong. Many others make the same sort of mistake.

1 See the 1968 lecture William Williams and Welsh Calvinistic Methodism in Dr Martyn Lloyd-Jones, The Puritans, their origins and successors, Banner of Truth Trust, 1987.
2 See Ian Hamilton, What Is Experiential Calvinism? USA, 2015, booklet.
3 See for example Jonathan Edwards, The Treatise on Religious Affections, 1824, USA
4 See Isaiah 2:13, 48:1, 2, 58:1-13; Ezek 33:3032; Matt 7:15, 23:27, 28; Rom 2:20-24, 1 Tim 5:8; Titus 1:16
5 Erroll Hulse, Who are the Puritans?, UK, 2000. See also, Phil Johnson, “For decades, evangelicals have been taught both by precept and by example, that experience is the lens through which we should evaluate the Bible and its doctrines. But that’s exactly backwards. We need to scrutinise and evaluate our experience in the light of God’s Word. … if we say we look to Scripture as the supreme and sufficient test of all truth claims, then Scripture must be the judge of our experience and not vice versa … I think the typical evangelical today is prone to get it exactly backwards. If Scripture doesn’t jive with their experience, they’ll reinterpret the passage; or more often, perhaps, they simply ignore it. And in effect then, their whole religion is shaped by experience; and, in fact, that is paganism’s epistemology. It is a form of paganism.” https:// www.gty.org/conferences/session/TM19-2/scripture-vs-human-experience-phil-johnson, accessed November 2025
6 H C G Moule, The Epistles to the Colossians and Philemon, UK, 1898, He continues by saying that in the context, Paul's prayer is no untimely message for us. In many quarters of our Christendom nothing is more in fashion than “an untheological devotion.” “The religious sentiment” is regarded far and wide as a thing which can live and be healthy with a very minimum of revelation, and with an almost nil of reasoned doctrine; above all of the doctrine of a divine Christ, an atoning Cross, and a rescue from “the authority of the darkness.” But such “sentiment,” however warm, has no ultimate “last” in it. Under very moderate pressure from fashions of thought, and from attractive personalities, it is ready to go as far as possible from the ground on which alone the world, the flesh, and the devil can be really met.
7 D M Lloyd-Jones, The Christian Soldier: An Exposition of Ephesians 6:10-20, Banner of Truth, 1977, 342
8 See for example The New Encyclopedia of Christian Quotations, USA, 2000

20260121

Micah Thomas 1776-1853


This article first appeared in the Evangelical Magazine

The online Dictionary of Welsh Biography says that Micah Thomas was ‘devout, scholarly, and resolute of will’ and that he ‘stood for a better-educated ministry, and strove to supply it.’ His administrative skills and discipline were criticised as was his Calvinistic orthodoxy, but he was undeterred and ‘his ideals eventually prevailed’, the importance of his work being gratefully recognised. Between 1807 and 1836, he taught over a hundred ministerial students, three of whom went on to head Baptist colleges themselves, in Pontypool, Haverfordwest and Llangollen.

Monmouthshire
Little is known of his early life, but Thomas was born on the Caldicot levels, in Whitson, on February 19, 1778. His pious farmer parents belonged to New Inn Independent Church, Pontypool. While Micah was still young, they moved to a farm in Llangibby. He was educated first at Tredunnock, then at Trosnant, Pontypool. Though taught by Anglican clergymen, when only 17, he was baptised by immersion and joined Penygarn Welsh Baptist Church, Pontypool. The following year, 1796, he began to preach.

England
Micah soon entered Bristol Baptist College under Dr John Ryland and remained there nearly two years. He was ordained on September 29, 1802, as minister at Ryeford, near Ross, Herefordshire, where he had often preached as a student. There he met his first wife, a widow twenty years his senior, Sophia Wall, née Pritchard.

Abergavenny
Many in Wales had long recognised the need for a better-educated, better-trained ministry. First Presbyterians and Independents, then, in the 1730s, Baptists sought to remedy the situation. At Penygarn, Miles Harry and his brother-in-law John Griffith, manager of Pontypool Iron Works and probably the prime mover, started an academy at Trosnant that did good service for several years but ceased to function sometime around 1761. Baptists wanting to train for ministry now had to travel to Bristol to be educated (in English). It was nearby, had high standards, and was led by Welshman, Hugh Evans and his son Caleb Evans, but Welshmen educated there often settled in England, and it was increasingly felt that Wales needed its own college.
It was at the home of John Harris, in Abergavenny, that things came to a head in 1805. John’s wife, Elizabeth, daughter of Miles Harry’s son, Caleb Harris, one-time minister at Llanwenarth, was talking the matter over with her daughters when the surgeon, Isaac Wyke (1770-1835), joined them. Either he, or perhaps it was Thomas himself, suggested that an academy be started in the town. After a lengthy discussion, a proposal was brought to the association (then meeting at Penygarn) the next day, and it was approved. Elizabeth went to Bristol to collect funds, receiving gifts from Caleb Evans’ widow, Sarah, and others. Extensive preparations went on through 1805 and 1806. A committee was appointed, and Thomas was elected tutor. On the first day of 1807, the academy opened with one student, Jonathan Davies of Capel Iwan, Carmarthenshire. Two others joined him the next month.
Students lived in rented rooms in the town and came for tuition to Thomas’ home, Aenon House, in the Pen-y-Pound area. In his capable hands, the academy grew in strength, usefulness and influence. Never large and with a necessarily modest curriculum, it was greatly used to advance the kingdom in Wales. Over 29 years, many men, some very able, were trained and became ministers.
It is unclear at what point the idea arose, but as well as tutoring, Thomas also became minister of a small new English Baptist Church, later on Frogmore Street. It prospered under his ministry, though sadly there was a secession in 1827 when Bethany, Abergavenny, was founded. With increasing honour and commanding influence, Thomas remained pastor until his death, November 28, 1853, and is buried in the church burial-ground.

Fullerism
Over the years, Thomas increasingly faced criticism by hardline Calvinists who considered him Arminian. This was because he opposed high Calvinism, preferring the soteriology of Jonathan Edwards and Andrew Fuller, whom he once spoke of as ‘that extraordinary and illustrious character’. A highlight in Thomas’ life was in 1812, when Fuller made his one visit to Wales to preach. It only lasted a week, but he made a powerful impression, and during his visit, he enjoyed good fellowship with the great Christmas Evans, who very much appreciated his ministry.
With regard to the college, matters came to a head in the early thirties, when five students complained that Thomas referred more often to John Wesley than John Gill. They left to join William Jones of Bethany, Cardiff. Thomas’ resignation, early in 1836, however, was probably more to do with his health. In 1828, a tumour had been removed from his left knee in London, and in the ensuing years, the exacting demands of his double role proved too much. On March 9, 1836, a committee convened to consider the academy’s future and decided on a transfer to Pontypool, under Thomas Thomas. It remained there until moving to Cardiff in 1893.

Character
Thomas had no children of his own. His first wife died in 1829, and the next year he married Elizabeth Harris’ sister, Rachel Harris.
Devout and earnest, Thomas sought to spread the gospel at home and abroad. Competent in Latin, Greek and Hebrew, he was widely read. Contemporaries considered him to be an able theologian, a cultured and independent thinker, and an erudite and accurate scholar. As a tutor, he could lead without being harsh. As a preacher, he was scriptural and expository, working out his themes with logical precision and thoroughness, but in language, it is suggested, above the understanding of many hearers. As a pastor, he was kind, sympathetic and generous to the poor and needy.
A convinced Baptist, he was ever ready to affirm and defend their distinctive principles but was no sectarian. Local vicar, Canon William Powell, was a close friend.
A letter can be found among Chartist paper archives written by Thomas, urging mercy toward John Frost and others convicted following the Chartist riots in November 1839. He was able to get their sentences commuted to transportation for life.

Lessons
Being dead, he yet speaks. He reminds us of the vital need for an educated ministry and the importance of Fuller’s moderate Calvinism. Be firm in your convictions about baptism and other matters, but with a catholic spirit that accepts all true believers. In our generation, let us seek to be as diligent, devout and disciplined as he was in his.

20251110

Jesus and Zoology



This article first appeared in
The Banner of Truth Magazine

John Stott famously wrote that “many Christians have a good doctrine of redemption, but need a better doctrine of creation,” and urged people to be ornithologists or what he called, tongue-in-cheek, orni-theologists, in light of Jesus's command to Consider the birds.1 If we love the Bible we should not only be ornithologists but zoologists too, to some extent, as the Bible mentions over 120 species in its pages.2
That is not so easy for many of us today who live in urban settings and see very little of animals. Some cats and dogs, a few birds and squirrels, perhaps, but little otherwise. In Jesus's day far more people came across animals in their everyday life, whether living in the countryside or in the town. Certainly Jesus interacts with and speaks about many animals. Camels, chickens, dogs, donkeys, fish, foxes, goats, oxen, scorpions, sheep, snakes, sparrows, vultures, wolves. Nearly a score are mentioned in the Gospels altogether.

Jesus and the animals
Most homes at that time would have been set up so that one part of the house was occupied by human beings and the other part by animals. Farmyard smells would be normal.3 We know that when Jesus was born, there was no room where humans normally slept and so he was born among the animals and at first placed in a manger, originally designed for feeding animals. Because of that setting a tradition has developed that oxen and donkeys were present at the birth. That cannot be proved, any more than we can be certain that Joseph and Mary travelled from Nazareth to Bethlehem on a donkey rather than on foot.4 However, the reference to shepherds in Luke 2 alerts us to the fact that they were looking after sheep near the place where Jesus was born.5
Luke tells us that when Jesus was six weeks old his poor parents sacrificed two young doves or pigeons at the Temple, as required by the law.6 The sacrificial system would have brought many Jews into regular contact with animals. The smell of blood, offal and roasting meat would have been familiar to Jewish people.
It would seem that Jesus cleansed the Temple at least twice, once at the beginning and once at the end of his ministry. In John 2:14, 15 it specifically says that In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.7
As he grew up, it is likely that Jesus would have interacted with and observed various animals, although there is no direct evidence for this.
At the beginning of his ministry, Jesus was baptised by John, a man whose very basic diet consisted of locusts and wild honey made by wild bees.8 John declared Jesus to be the Lamb of God pointing to him as the Passover Lamb.9 When John had baptised Jesus, a dove descended on the Messiah symbolising his anointing by the Spirit.10 Straight after his baptism he was thrust out by the Spirit into the wilderness to be confronted by the Devil. Mark 1:12, 13 says that during those forty days He was with the wild animals, and angels attended him.11 As in Luke 2, where shepherds, sheep and angels are referenced, it reminds us that in this universe, there are heavenly creatures who are pure spirit, animals with no immortal soul and human beings who, like Jesus, God incarnate, have a soul and a body. As C S Lewis once put it “Humans are amphibians - half spirit and half animal. As spirits they belong to the eternal world, but as animals they inhabit time.”12 The wild animals would perhaps include striped hyenas, wolves, Arabian leopards and lions.
Jesus's disciples included several fishermen and several miracles feature fish – either being caught from the lake or multiplied in order to feed multitudes.13 Tilapia were perhaps the most common fish at the time. Jesus sends out his disciples to fish for people.14 In Matthew 12:40 he refers to the great fish that swallowed and vomited out Jonah, a picture of Jesus's own resurrection.15
In the parables of the wedding feast and the prodigal son, there are references to fattened cattle used for a feast.16 Then there is Jesus casting demons into the herd of pigs, unclean animals for Jews, on the other side of the Sea of Galilee. The pigs then ran into the sea and drowned.17 In Luke 14:19 a man says that he cannot follow Jesus because he has just bought five yoke of oxen, and is on his way to try them out.
In the final week of his life, Jesus deliberately rides into Jerusalem on a donkey to fulfil the prophecy in Zechariah 9:9. A donkey rather than a horse as it speaks of a royal peace bringer.18 In many cultures the sound of the rooster or cockerel crowing is common, especially in the early morning. Jesus predicts that Peter will deny him three times before the cockerel crows.19

Jesus's references to animals as he teaches
In the course of his teaching, Jesus makes several references to different animals. He clearly accepts that we can learn from the animal kingdom. Fish and fishing have already been mentioned but also, teaching on prayer, Jesus pointed out that if a child asks its father for a fish, he will not give them a snake, or if he asks for an egg, he will not give them a scorpion.20 Fish and snakes are both scaly, eggs and scorpions bear no obvious resemblance. Jesus might have come into contact with snakes and scorpions. Some 42 species of snake are said to exist in the area today, half of these being venomous.21 As for scorpions, 21 of the one thousand known types can be found in the area today, only five of which are poisonous. The most dangerous is the yellow scorpion or deathstalker.22 In John 3:14 Jesus refers to the bronze snake Moses held up in the wilderness, which foreshadows the cross. When the seventy or seventy-two return from their mission Jesus tells them he has given them authority to trample on snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will harm them.23 Like John, Jesus refers to the Pharisees and Sadducees and others as snakes and vipers who poison people with their false teaching.24
The biggest concentration of animal references comes perhaps in Matthew 10:16, where some four animals are mentioned. Jesus says to his disciples that he is sending them out like sheep among wolves. Therefore he says they need to be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves. Proverbially, the latter two are known for their subtlety and for their innocence (doves are simple and transparent). Wolves were known as predators, especially against sheep.
Sheep, of course, are mentioned many times by Jesus. He tells us he is the Good Shepherd who cares for his sheep.25 He also sees the people as sheep without a shepherd.26 They lack the leadership the Good Shepherd can give. In Matthew 25 there is a parable about the end of the world where the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, standing for the righteous and the wicked.27 Certain types of sheep and goats, especially in the east, can look similar and are often kept together. In Hebrew the two are not always sharply distinguished. In John 21 Peter is told by Jesus to feed and take care of his sheep and lambs.
In a striking image in Matthew 11:29, 30 Jesus calls on all to take his yoke upon them and learn from him, for he is gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For he says my yoke is easy and my burden is light. The picture is of oxen, Christ and his disciple under the same easy yoke.
Using a powerful zoological image, Jesus laments over Jerusalem, saying, Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing.28 More than one reference is made to birds, especially sparrows, mainly to encourage believers to see that if God looks after little birds he will also look after them.29
The Canaanite woman in the Tyre and Sidon area refers to Gentiles as dogs, as does Jesus, when she asks him to heal her daughter. It was a common term in that time, Jesus is impressed with her reply.30 In Matthew 7:6 Jesus himself warns against giving what is holy to dogs or throwing pearls to pigs.31 Dogs then, of course, were not often pets but tended to be the disease ridden, wild or scavenger mongrel type.
At one time Jesus told a man who wanted to follow him that Foxes have dens and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.32 He also refers to Herod Antipas, a deceitful destroyer, as that fox.33
A famous saying of Jesus is that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.34 A camel, probably a one humped dromedary, would be one of the biggest animals around, elephants being native to Africa and India but not, at least by that time, to the middle east.
Another saying of Jesus says Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather.35 Vultures, it is well known, look for carrion. Wherever there is a dead body, they will swoop down When Jesus comes again it will be very visible and obvious.
The only other obvious reference to animal life is where Jesus, warning of hell, describes it as the place where worms do not die and the fire is not quenched.36 When a body is buried, the worms, as we say, eat it. These worms are not earth worms but maggots, which hatch from the eggs that flies lay on dead bodies. There are also “worms” that do not die, in hell, that continuously eat away at the souls of unconverted sinners.
Such references remind us that when we encounter animals, there are lessons to be learned, if we are awake to the possibility. At the very least we should have in mind the lessons that shrewd snakes, innocent doves, well fed birds, unholy dogs, foxes in their dens, yoked oxen, incongruous camels, gathering vultures and never dying worms can teach us.

Footnotes
1 John R W Stott, The Birds, Our Teachers: Essays in Orni-theology 2008
2 See the online Wikipedia article Animals in the Bible (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals_in_the_Bible)
3 See Kenneth E Bailey Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes, cultural studies in the Gospels 2008
4 The ox and ass tradition is based on Isaiah 1:3
5 Luke 2:8-21
6 Luke 2:24
7 Matthew 21:12-17, Mark 11:15-19, Luke 19:45-48, John 2:13-16
8 Matthew 3:4, Mark 1:6
9 John 1:29, 36; see also Revelation 5:6-13
10 Matthew 3:16; Mark 1:10; Luke 3:22; John 1:32
11 Interestingly, in this context, when Satan quotes Psalm 91:11, 12 For he will command his angels concerning you to guard you in all your ways; they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone. he forbears to quote the succeeding verse (13) You will tread on the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great lion and the serpent. Perhaps a little too close for comfort. See Matthew 4:1-11, Luke 4:1-13.
12 C S Lewis, Screwtape Letters, Letter VIII, 1942
13 Matthew 14:17-21, 15:34-38; Mark 6:38-44, 8:6-9; Luke 9:13-17; John 6:9-13
14 Matthew 4:19; Mark 1:17
15 Jonah is also mentioned in Luke 11:30. The species of the fish is unknown.
16 Matthew 22:4; Luke 15:23, 27, 30
17 Matthew 8:30-32; Mark 5:11-13, Luke 8:32, 33
18 Matthew 21:2-7; Mark 11:2-7; Luke 19:30-35; John 12:14, 15
19 Matthew 26:34, 74, 75; Mark 14:30, 72; Luke 22:34, 60, 61; John 13:38, 18:27
20 Matthew 7:10, Luke 11:11, 12
21 A Bar and G Haimovitch A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Israel 2011, 117-201
22See Hadassah University Medical Center online article (https://www.hadassah.org.il/en/er_bites_and_stings/)
23 Luke 10:19
24 Matthew 3:7, Luke 3:7; Matthew 12:34, 23:33
25 John 10:11, 14, etc
26 Matthew 9:36
27 See verses 32, 33
28 Matthew 23:37, see also Luke 13:34
29 Matthew 6:25, 26, 10:29-31. Ravens are specified in Luke 12:24 See also the passing references to birds in the parables, Matthew 13:4, 32; Mark 4:4, Luke 8:5, 13:19
30 Matthew 15:26, 27, Mark 7:27, 28
31Pigs and dogs were unclean animals under Jewish law. Pigs are pronounced unclean in Leviticus 11:7, 8.
32 Matthew 8:20, Luke 9:58
33 Luke 13:32
34 Matthew 19:24, Mark 10:24, 25, Luke 18:25
35 Matthew 24:28, Luke 17:37
36 Mark 9:48, referencing Isaiah 66:24

66 Books You Must Read Before You Die


At some point early in this century or before, people started to talk about what they wanted to do before they died, their bucket list as it is called. This soon transmuted into lists of places to visit, films to see and books to read. We are now familiar with lists such as 100 Books to read before you die or The forty best books to read before you die. Such lists include novels such as Jane Eyre or 1984 and non-fiction titles such as The Diary of Anne Frank. Occasionally, you will see spiritually helpful items such as Augustine's Confessions or Pilgrims Progress mentioned and even the Bible itself and its sixty six books in such lists but not often.

The 66 best read books of all time
When we consider how massively influential the sixty-six books that make up the Bible are, it is perhaps surprising to learn how little read they are. Surveys suggest that many intelligent people have never actually read the sixty-six, even some who profess to be Christians.
This is strange in some ways as the sixty-six books that form the Bible are together the best selling, most widely available, most often translated books on planet earth.
When it comes to those sixty-six books, the Bible is far and away the best selling set of books of all time. The Guinness Book of World Records estimates that more than 5 billion copies of the Bible have been printed. Other texts are not even close to that figure. The Quran - only 800 million copies; The Book of Mormon - only 120 million. Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong or the little red book has several hundred million copies in print but is nowhere near the Bible in number.
The Wycliffe Global Alliance tell us that the world's 7.9 billion people speak some 7378 languages. At present 717 of these languages have all 66 books translated and 3495 languages, some 7.04 billion people, have some part of the Bible. Work is currently going on with a further 828 languages, covering another 67.6 million people.
There are people who cannot read the sixty-six books of the Bible for themselves, then, but a vast number can - and yet so many of them choose not to do so. While they are busy reading Moby Dick or Lord of the Rings, the sixty-six get short shrift.

Encouraging people to read the Sixty-six
So what can we, we who have read the sixty-six, or most of them, do to encourage others to read them?
It is generally agreed that the best place to start is with one of the Gospels is. Mark is shortest, Matthew is good for religious people and Luke is for anyone. John also suits everyone but is different to the others in being more theological in style. All the sixty-six are about the Lord Jesus Christ but it is most obvious in the Gospels which provide us with portraits of Jesus, focusing especially on his death and resurrection.
Only two or three others of the sixty-six are seen under separate cover. Paul's Letter to the Romans is sometimes done like that. That is useful as it sets out Paul's theology for us in a systematic way. Do read Romans. The Old Testament Book of Psalms is also sometimes seen like that. It contains 150 hymns and prayers reflecting on God's Law and the coming Messiah. The book is best loved by those already converted to Christ.

New Testament
The 27 books of the New Testament are often seen bound in one volume, of course, either with or without the Psalms. Once people have read the Gospels, one would encourage them to read the Book of Acts, also sometimes found under separate cover. It gives the history of the church from the Christ's ascension to the end of Paul's three missionary journeys.
Most of the rest of the New Testament is letters. First, Paul's 13 letters to churches and individuals. There are nine to churches in Rome, Corinth, Galatia, Ephesus, Philippi, Colossae and Thessalonica then four to individuals. Of the latter, the two to Timothy and the one to Titus deal with matters of particular interest to pastors who should read and re-read those books.
Next is the Letter to the Hebrews. We are not sure who wrote it but, if not Paul, it must be by someone in his circle. It particularly focuses on the High Priesthood of Christ. We then have seven short general letters - three by John, two by Peter, one each by James and Jude. These are important too and not to be neglected.
The last book in the New Testament is Revelation (not Revelations). It is a book full of symbolism and not easy to read or understand but once you start spotting things like the way the writer, John, uses the number seven, it begins to make sense. One great help to understanding it better is to get to know the Old Testament books.

Genesis to Esther
A full Bible not only has the 27 books of the New Testament but the 39 books of the Old Testament too. These are again all about Jesus Christ but because they were written long before he was born this is usually less obvious. These books contain prophecies, types and shadows of what was going to come. Chapters, like Isaiah 53 are very obviously about Jesus but in some cases this is much harder to spot.
The first five books were written by Moses and take us from the world's creation to the time just before God's people enter the Promised Land. Genesis and Exodus are easy to read as they are mostly story but Leviticus and Numbers are not so easy nor is Deuteronomy.
After those five come Joshua and Judges, taking us from the conquest of the land to the time just before the first king of Israel. After Judges there is a little book called Ruth, which is not only a charming story but a real pointer to King David and to Jesus himself.
Next come three big books, so big the Jews divided each of them in two. First come the Books of Samuel then the Books of Kings. They take us from Samuel, the last of the Judges, through Saul, David and Solomon on to the kings who ruled over the divided kingdoms north and south, down to the time when Judah was sent into exile in Babylon. The third book, Chronicles, goes all the way from Adam to the exile. The opening chapters are not easy to read as they are mostly genealogies. There are things in Chronicles you will not find anywhere else so it is a must read.
After Chronicles comes Ezra and Nehemiah, both about the Jews' amazing return from the exile. The Book of Esther follows, a remarkable story about the providence of God to his people when still in exile. The striking thing about it is that it never mentions God by name. It would be great book to start with for anyone wanting to read the Bible.

Job to Malachi
After all that history, we get five books usually referred to as books of wisdom. The first, Job, is from a time before Moses and deals with the difficult subject of suffering. The beginning and end are easy to read but many chapters lie between, not always easy to read, where Job's friends try to prove to him he is suffering because he has done something wrong, which we know he has not. It is a fascinating and important work that is worth reading and re-reading.
We have mentioned the Book of Psalms, mostly by David. There is also the Book of Proverbs, mostly by his son Solomon. A large part of Proverbs is taken up with proverbs, brief and pithy sayings oozing with wisdom that point in one way or another to Jesus Christ, the wisdom of God. In this section we also have The Song of Songs and Ecclesiastes, not always easy books to interpret but full of wisdom about our relationship with God and with one another.
The rest of the Old Testament is given over to the prophets, major and minor. Major and minor refer to the length of the books they left, not their importance. There are four major ones and twelve minor ones, all worth reading. Of the major ones, Daniel who lived in exile in Babylon is perhaps the easiest, as the first six chapters tell stories about him and his three friends. The second six chapters are more like Revelation. Isaiah is long but there are many prophecies of Messiah that are full of interest and plenty of encouraging verses about the future. Jeremiah and Ezekiel are among the most difficult books to read but are worth reading for the way they point forward to Christ. Where would we be without Jeremiah 31 or Ezekiel 36? With Jeremiah there is a bonus - a little book called Lamentations, a lament over the destruction of Jerusalem. Right in the middle there are some tremendously encouraging words about how great is God's faithfulness.
The last twelve books are all prophets. The Book of Jonah is the best known. It is different to the others and is well known for how it tells the story of Jonah being sent to Nineveh, refusing to go, then being first swallowed then vomited out by a great fish. The other minor prophets, with strange names like Habakkuk or Haggai, are all worth reading too. The first, Hosea, is all about the love of God. Most of the minor prophets are short. Obadiah is only one chapter. It is not always clear who prophesied when but the last three, Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi, all prophesied after the return from exile. It would be another four hundred years after the last of these before John the Baptist began to prophesy and make way for Messiah Jesus.

How many?
So how many of these sixty-six have you read? How many of them do you know well? They are the most important sixty-six books in existence. Some are more important than others, it is true, but all are God breathed and have something important to teach us about the Lord Jesus Christ and serving him. Do not allow the dust to gather on these amazing books. Read them and read them again. They will be more valuable to you than anything by Dickens or Tolstoy, as great as those writers were, or even Calvin or Spurgeon for that matter. If you never get to read The Great Gatsby or Brave New World it is a pity but if you neglect these sixty-six books it will be a tragedy indeed.
In 2014 Andy Miller published The Year of reading dangerously where he describes how he read some fifty books he had never got round to reading before. How did he do it? Just by getting on with it. There was no big secret. What about you and these sixty-six? If you read three or four chapters a day, you could easily read all sixty-six in a year. There are various plans that will take you through all the books in a shorter or longer period. You will never regret time spent reading them. So get started today.

This article first appeared in In Writing and also appears elsewhere on this blog

20250430

Causes of Salvation in Reformed Thinking

After Lysippos, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

This article first appeared in The Banner of Truth Magazine
In 1896, a collection of sermons by Southern Presbyterians appeared. Alongside the work of Dabney, Palmer, Girardeau and others is a sermon by a now forgotten minister called Walter William Moore (1857-1926). His sermon on James 1:18 is called The three causes of salvation. (Southern Presbyterian pulpit: a collection ..., Presbyterian Committee of Publication, Richmond Va, 1896, pp 277-286)
Moore was professor of Hebrew at Union Seminary, Virginia and a leading Southern Presbyterian in the first quarter of the twentieth century. In 1904 he became the first president of Union and in 1908, moderator of the General Assembly. Author of several books, in 1897 he delivered the Stone Lectures at Princeton Seminary, as well as a number of other prestigious lecture series.
James 1:18, Moore tells us, reveals three things about our salvation - the source (Of his own will begat he us); the means (with the word of truth); the object (that we should be a kind of first-fruits of his creatures.). He reminds us how philosophical writers are accustomed to distinguish three kinds of cause – efficient, instrumental, final. The efficient cause is the power that produces the result and without which no result can be produced; the instrumental cause, the means by which the power is applied; the final cause, the object contemplated in producing the effect
With a train, the efficient cause of motion is steam; the instrumental cause, the engine; the final cause, the transportation of passengers or produce. The efficient cause of a letter is the writer; the instrumental cause, the pen; the final cause, why it was written. When a tree is felled, the efficient cause is the one who chops it down; the instrumental cause, the axe; the final cause, the purpose for which the tree is felled.
When it comes to redemption, Moore says, leaning on Calvin, the efficient cause is God. The power that regenerates a human soul is nothing less than divine. He demonstrates this from his text and other Scriptures. The instrumental cause is God's Word. The Word has no power in itself, the Spirit must activate it but it is the instrument God uses to save. The final cause, from man's side, is That we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures. Moore explains the Old Testament background and says the great idea in connection with firstfruits is consecration, absolute devotion to God's service. James is saying that the object of our salvation is consecration to God's service.

For what purpose, then, are sinners saved? That they may finally escape the punishment due them for their sins? Yes, but that is secondary. That they may finally attain to the happiness of heaven? Yes, but that is secondary. The primary object of our salvation is consecration to God's service (p 285)


Calvin
If this way of considering salvation sounds unfamiliar, this was not the case in the past. Moore acknowledges that the roots of his method lie with the philosophers and with Calvin. In The Institutes, focusing on Romans 3:24-29 rather than on James, Calvin makes a fourfold rather than threefold distinction. He writes, with regard to our salvation, of
  • The efficient cause - the Triune God and his grace. He alone is the author and executor of our salvation. Without the Father's love, there would be no salvation.

  • The material cause - Christ and his righteousness alone. His righteousness is the ‘material’ granted to us as the substance of our salvation. The Son's obedience is crucial.

  • The sole instrumental cause - faith. Faith alone, which comes through the illumination of the Spirit, is the tool God uses to grant us the salvation stored up in Christ.

  • The final cause or purpose for granting us this salvation - that God might manifest his righteousness as the God who is just and justifies his people. That is, the final cause is the revelation of God’s glory.

(John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, 3.14.17. Library of Christian Classics, John T MacNeil, Ford Lewis Battles, Presbyterian Publishing Corporation, UK, 1960)

Reformer Zacharias Ursinus (1534-1583) is similar

We must observe, therefore, that it cannot be said that we are justified in the same sense by the grace of God, by the merits of Christ and by faith. The first must be understood of the moving cause, which is in God; the second of the formal cause, which is in Christ and the third of the instrumental cause, which is in us. We are justified by the mercy or grace of God as the chief moving cause, by which God was led to justify and save us; justified by the merits of Christ, partly as by the formal cause of our justification, inasmuch as God accepts of us in view of the obedience of Christ applied unto us and accounts us as righteous seeing that we are covered with this as with a garment and partly as the moving and meritorious cause, inasmuch as God on account of this acquits and frees us from the condemnation of the law. We are justified by faith as by an instrumental cause by which we apprehend the righteousness of Christ imputed unto us.

(Zacharias Ursinus, Commentary … on the Heidelberg Catechism, USA, 1888 edition, p 331)


Aristotle
This way of thinking is based on the way Aristotle and his successors taught and is everywhere in Reformed teaching.
For Aristotle there were four types of cause to any event. Take a sculptor making a sculpture for example.
  • The efficient cause - the person who will carry out the project, the sculptor.

  • The formal cause - the idea for the sculpture that the person has in his head, the form he intends the block of stone to take.

  • There is also the material cause - the block of stone, the actual material that will be the substance of the sculpture.

  • Last, the final cause - this is the purpose for which the whole project was conceived.

These are obviously not all causes in the same sense, but the word cause is applied to all four aspects as without any one of them the sculpture would not exist. After Aristotle, people spoke also of the instrumental cause, which equates to the tool that the sculptor uses to make the statue.
Obviously, one needs to be careful when making use of a secular method but as an analytical tool this one is clearly very useful.

Puritans and their contemporaries
This way of thinking and expounding is common enough among the Puritans and their contemporaries. Here are some examples.

In 1609 in The highway to heaven by Royalist Thomas Tuke (c 1580-1657) speaks of five or more causes. (Thomas Tuke, The Highway to Heaven; or the doctrine of Election, etc, Nicholas Okes, London, 1609)These are the internal impulsive cause leading to justification, which is God's grace and benevolence; the external impulsive or meritorious efficient cause, which is not our own works, virtues or obedience but Christ by his obedience; the material cause, in two parts, - remission of sins and God’s accepting of us as righteous men; the formal cause, “the free imputation of Christ’s righteousness, by which Christ’s merit and obedience are applied to us by virtue of that near communion whereby he is in us and we in him; the final cause: in respect of God, his glory “in an admirable composition of justice and mercy”; in respect of ourselves: that we may be pleasing to God, having peace of conscience and true tranquillity of mind and true piety.

In his major treatise, On Justification of 1633, George Downame (c 1566-1634), Bishop of Derry and one of the best Aristotelians of his time, sets out the efficient causes of justification, saying that the efficient cause is principally God himself and instrumentally, on one hand, God's Word and sacraments and, on the other, our faith in Jesus Christ. He says

when we say that faith does justify, we do not mean that it justifies absolutely or in respect of its own worth and dignity; and much less, that it does merit justification, either as it is an habit, or as it is an act, but relatively in respect of the object which it does apprehend, that is, Christ, who is our righteousness. (George Downame, A treatise of justification, Felix Kyngston for Nicolas Bourne, London, 1633, p 14)


The often pithy Anglican commentator John Trapp (1601-1669), looking at Romans 3, says “men are said to be justified effectively by God, apprehensively by faith, declaratively by good works.” (John Trapp, A Commentary Or Exposition Upon All the Books of the New Testament Wherein the Text is Explained, Some Controversies Discussed, etc, RW to be sold by Nath. Ekins, London, 1656,)
In a body of divinity published by prolific lay writer Edward Leigh (1602-1671) in 1654, a similar approach is found, this time with four elements. In Chapter 7 of that work it says “God justifies judicially, Christ’s blood meritoriously, Faith instrumentally, Works declaratively (Romans 3:24,28 and 4:5; Mark 5:36; Luke 8:50; Acts 13:39).” (Edward Leigh, A systeme or body of divinity consisting of 10 books, etc, AM for William Lee, London, 1654, p 528).
The Christian in complete armour by William Gurnall (c 1616-1679) is rightly famous. Early in that work he says of justification that the moving cause is the free mercy of God; the meritorious one, the blood of Christ and the instrumental one, “faith with all the sweet privileges that flow from it.” (William Gurnall The Christian in Complete Armour: A Treatise of the Saints' War Against the Devil, Wherein … etc. Edinburgh, 1865 edition, p 95).
John Owen (1616-1683), writing in 1674 on the Holy Spirit, is again similar

The purging of the souls of them that believe from the defilements of sin is, in the Scripture, assigned unto several causes of different kinds; for the Holy Spirit, the blood of Christ, faith, and afflictions, are all said to cleanse us from our sins, but in several ways, and with distinct kinds of efficacy. The Holy Spirit is said to do it as the principal efficient cause; the blood of Christ as the meritorious procuring cause; faith and affliction as the instrumental causes – the one direct and internal, the other external and occasional. (John Owen, A Discourse Concerning the Holy Spirit. See Works Vols 3 and 4. See Chapter 5 Book 4)


There is also a place where the author of Pilgrim's Progress, John Bunyan (1628-1688) says that Christians must warily distinguish betwixt the instrumental and the meritorious cause of justification. The latter is Christ, with what he has done and suffered. (John Bunyan, Salvation by grace, 1675. See Works Vol 1. See Section IX on Justification by faith).
In 1692 Walter Marshall (1616), in a sermon opening and applying the doctrine of justification, made the causes five, speaking not only of God being the efficient cause and faith being the instrumental cause but also of the impulsive cause being grace; the means effecting or material cause, the redemption of Christ and the formal cause, the remission of sins (Walter Marshall, The Gospel Mystery of Sanctification: Growing in Holiness by Living in Union with Christ Parkhurst, UK, 1692. See Appendix, The Doctrine of Justification Opened and Applied).

Later writers

This way of proceeding can be traced down the years in the works of many good reformed writers. Again, some examples.
In 1740, a brief collection of sermons by George Whitefield (1714-1770) was published. The volume contained an opening address on Whitefield by Josiah Smith (1704-1781) of Charleston, South Carolina. In the course of describing Whitefield's preaching, he says that he, on one hand,

earnestly contended for our justification as the free gift of God, by faith alone, in the blood of Christ, an article of faith delivered to the saints of old.

and on the other

took special care to guard against the licentious abuse of it, and would not make void the law, when he asserted that good works were the necessary fruits and evidences of true faith. 

He told people plainly

and with the clearest distinction, that a man was justified these three ways; meritoriously by Christ, instrumentally by faith alone, declaratively by good works. (George Whitefield, Fifteen sermons preached on various important subjects … To which is prefixed, a sermon, on ... Whitefield. By Joseph [ie Josiah] Smith VDM, Mathew Carey, 118, Market-St, Philadelphia, 1794. See p 14)

There is a similar reference to Calvinistic Methodist Martin Madan (1725-1790) in the works of Wesleyan Methodist John Fletcher of Madeley (1729-1785). In a 1773 work we read

By Christ only are we meritoriously justified, and by faith only are we instrumentally justified in the sight of God; but by works, and not by faith only, are we declaratively justified before men and angels (Martin Madan quoted in John Fletcher, Five checks to Antinomianism. See Works, p 239). 


In 1840, Canadian Presbyterian James Bennet wrote of justification (James Bennet, Justification as revealed in Scripture, in opposition to the Council of Trent, and Mr. Newman's lectures Hamilton, Adams & Co, UK, 1840,)
  • The material cause is not the inner man made holy as Trent decreed but Christ or his perfect righteous.
  • The instrumental cause is faith that lays hold of this hope to unite us with One who cannot but be justified.
  • The meritorious cause is the Saviour who has deserved that all whom he lays hold of and who apprehend that for which they are apprehended should be treated as himself.
  • The efficient cause is the whole Deity ….
  • The final cause is the glory of God for which all things but especially moral and accountable agents exist …. that grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Preaching on John 18:37, American Presbyterian Charles Seymour Robinson (1829-1899) says of salvation

The original cause is the grace of God; the meritorious cause is Christ's atonement; the efficient cause is the Holy Ghost; but the instrumental cause is the "Word of truth" (John 15:8), and faith therein (https://biblehub.com/sermons/john/18-37.htm (accessed July 18, 2024)).

In 1859 the Strict Baptist George Wyard (1803-1873) said that salvation has several parts - “its moving cause is love, the love of God; its meritorious cause is blood, the blood of Christ; its efficient cause power, the power of the Spirit.” In other places he puts it differently, for example later expanding on this and adding to the meritorious and material cause of it, which is the blood and righteousness of the Lord Jesus and the efficient and applying cause of it, the Holy Ghost,

The enjoying and realising cause, faith in the Son of God by the Spirit; the promoting and confirming cause, the word of life through the Spirit and the ultimate and final cause, everlasting happiness with and complete conformity to Christ in eternal glory, for whom God justifies he glorifies. (George Wyard A series of pastoral letters ... on the leading doctrines of the gospel UK, 1859, pp 44, 74)


A more modern example of this sort of statement is that of A W Pink (1886-1952). In A Fourfold Salvation, written in 1938, he writes of salvation that the ...

Originating cause is the eternal purpose of God, or, in other words, the predestinating grace of the Father.
Meritorious cause is the mediation of Christ, this having particular respect to the legal side of things, or, in other words, His fully meeting the demands of the law on the behalf and in the stead of those he redeems.
Efficient cause is the regenerating and sanctifying operations of the Holy Spirit, which respect the experimental side of it, or, in other words, the Spirit works in us what Christ purchased for us. Thus, we owe our personal salvation equally to each Person in the Trinity, and not to one (the Son) more than to the others.
Instrumental cause is our faith, obedience, and perseverance; though we are not saved because of them, equally true is it that we cannot be saved (according to God’s appointment) without them.

(A W Pink, A Fourfold Salvation, Vol 17 No 7 Studies in the Scriptures, Sovereign Grace Publishers, 1938, p 20)

A final example would be that of R C Sproul (1939-2017) who also distinguishes causes in order to help us understand and maintain the unique role of faith. One way to think of these causes, he says, is to view them as various layers of the answer to the question, “Why are we saved?” There are four answers to this one question.

  1. God determined to save us by his grace.
  2. Christ and his righteousness.
  3. Faith in Christ, not our own works.
  4. That God might be glorified.

Each has its own place, if understood correctly. And each must stay in its own place to be understood correctly. He says that the causes of eternal salvation are three.

Efficient cause – it is always said in Scripture to be the mercy and free love of the heavenly Father towards us who believe.

Material cause - Christ, with the obedience by which he purchased righteousness for believers.
Instrumental cause - must be faith. He quotes Calvin, “Faith is thus the instrumental cause by which righteousness is applied to us.”

(R C Sproul https://www.ligonier.org/learn/series/what-is-reformed-theology/faith-alone-part-2#: ~:text=The%20Reformers%20said%20that%20the,Christ%20is%20given%20to%20us.
Accessed July 18, 2024)

This way of approach has perhaps been forgotten by some today but, in its various forms, it is worth re-examining as a useful tool for explicating the Reformed understanding of salvation.

20250226

Candle in the wind conscience in natural man Part 2


Keep listening 
Although the conscience of the unbeliever is imperfect and fallible he ought to be encouraged to listen to it. Like a Supreme Court judgement or one from the House of Lords (or should we say Strasbourg?) the conscience speaks categorically and absolutely. There is no room for further appeal. (11 Kant spoke of conscience as the "Categorical imperative". A Professor Shairp in the 19th century spoke of it as "The absolute in the soul". In his "Sermon on Human Nature" Butler says that "without being consulted" the conscience magisterially asserts itself in approving or condemning), In each case conscience must be followed. At one point in his Christian Directory Richard Baxter opposes this view. (Richard Baxter, Christian Directory, Soli Deo Gloria Reprint, Grand Direction X: " ... There is a dangerous error. .. that a man is bound to do everything which his conscience telleth him is the will of God and that every man must obey his conscience as if it were the lawgiver of the world, whereas indeed it is not ourselves but God who is our lawgiver. Conscience is not authorised to make us any duty which God bath not made us, only to discern the law of God and call upon us to observe it: an erring conscience is not to be obeyed, but to be better informed.") He calls it a dangerous error to think that the conscience must always be followed. What about when the conscience is misinformed? One recognises his point but once you begin to ignore or disobey your conscience, confusion and trouble are bound to follow. Surely Luther's famous dictum is correct, "To act against conscience is neither right nor safe". Matthew Henry agrees, "We must never be over-awed either by majesty or multitude to do a sinful thing and go against our consciences." It is surely never right for a man to do what he believes to be wrong. "Blessed is the man who does not condemn himself by what he approves" (Romans 14:22).
There is a dilemma here of course. RC Sproul has dubbed it the "double jeopardy dilemma". (R C Sproul, Right and Wrong: Ethics and the Christian Today, Scripture Union, 1986, p. 93). If we follow conscience into sin we are guilty. Yet to act against conscience is also a sin. This is not to support the Roman Catholic idea of what is called invincible ignorance, rather it is to stress that it is imperative that all men seek to conform their moral record to the revealed will of God. When we mention Luther's dictum quoted above we must remember that he began by saying "My conscience is captive to the Word of God". It is not enough to set your watch by the kitchen clock, you must also be sure that the clock is conforming to the astronomical standards of time. Bishop Charles Gore, the first Bishop of Birmingham, got it right when he said "Man's first duty is to enlighten his conscience not to follow it". Do not waste time and cause damage by endeavouring to get anyone to act against their conscience. Instead concentrate on encouraging them to keep their moral record informed by the Word of God. Listening to your conscience is not a problem. It is a good thing. It is in the inadequacies of the moral record that the problem lies.

The content
We can understand, then, why John Knox could say to Mary, Queen of Scots, that her conscience was useless- because it was not properly informed! What matters so much is the content of the moral standard to which conscience bears witness. Jiminy Cricket's advice in song "always follow your conscience" is fine as far as it goes, but what good is it if my moral record is ill-informed?
Oswald Chambers points out in his book on Biblical psychology that to speak of educating the conscience is half truth, half error. As A H Strong puts it, conscience itself can only be educated "in the sense of acquiring greater facility and quickness in making decisions". (Chambers p 219, Strong p 500).
Chambers uses the illustration of the effects of coloured light. We need the pure white light of Jesus Christ shining in our hearts if we are ever to see things as they really are. The education we need is for God's requirements to be laid on our hearts.
Similarly, in his book on Ethics, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German theologian who died at the hands of the Gestapo, speaks of people in his day who said, "Adolf Hitler is my conscience". By that they meant that the Fiihrer was their moral standard. The ramifications of such a hopeless statement are now obvious to all. Rather, as Bonhoeffer rightly says, people should say, "Jesus Christ is my conscience".
The high court of conscience is not the highest court, it can only look to a higher one, the law of God itself. Paul makes this clear in 1 Corinthians 4:4, My conscience is clear, but that does not make me innocent. It is the Lord who judges me. (The apostle is a notorious example, before his conversion, of an excusing conscience where his actions were anything but pleasing to God. Cf. Acts 23:1, 26:9; Philippians 3:4-6; 2 Timothy 1 :3; John 16:2).
As Herman Ridderbos and many of the older Reformed commentators point out, the reference here is not so much to the inadequacy of conscience but to the importance of the coming judgment. (Ridderbos, Pauline Theology, p 292ff.). What matters is not what our peers think or what other men think. Not even what we think ourselves. What matters is God's verdict. However, the verse also implies the imperfect nature of the conscience and this ought to be remembered. The judgment of conscience does not mean the end of all dispute - something to which those who break the law in just causes ought to give careful thought.
The healthy conscience is often consistent, although never infallible. A healthy conscience is not easily fooled. It is stubborn. It is not swayed by popular opinion or fear of danger. Obstinate, persistent and inflexible your conscience is a good friend to have when it is right, but it is a real handicap otherwise. A misinformed conscience can lead you into big trouble and also cause harm to others. It is something like a magnetic compass. While the needle points to magnetic north all is well. But if at some stage you enter a strong magnetic field which is not that of the earth itself disaster may well follow if you continue to rely on that compass. Or to put it another way, following your nose is a good way to get to a place, but first you have to point your nose in the right direction!

Resistible
Another problem with the conscience, even the well informed conscience, is that although it is usually persistent it can be resisted. The conscience can pursue a man for crimes committed decades ago. Even the memory of a relatively minor misdemeanour can haunt a person for years. "The torture of a bad conscience is the hell of a living soul" wrote Calvin. "I would bear any affliction rather than be burdened with a guilty conscience" said Spurgeon. Thunderbolts, tornadoes, a dungeon full of snakes, being burnt at the stake- all were preferable to him. (C H Spurgeon, see the entry under "Conscience" in Tom Carter, Spurgeon at his Best, Baker Book House, 1988).
Some people have even taken their own lives rather than live with their accusing conscience. The conscience truly is, at times, "an awesome force with which to reckon" (Rudnick, p 127). Nevertheless, it can be resisted. If it cannot be ignored it can still be defied. An active conscience will guarantee nothing. If desensitised enough it can even be hardened to the point where it virtually ceases to function.

Inadequate yet an ally
We need a balanced view of the strengths and weaknesses of conscience. On the one hand, the conscience is inadequate to save a man.
"Did any man's conscience, unenlightened by the Spirit, ever tell him that his sins deserved damnation?" asks Spurgeon. "Did it ever lead any man to feel an abhorrence of sin as sin? Did conscience ever bring a man to such self-renunciation that he totally abhorred himself and all his works and came to Christ?"
Such questions have to be answered in the negative. The conscience is not the same as God's own Word.
On the other hand, the conscience is still a God-given gift witnessing to the state of our relationship with our Maker. It is an eternal voice speaking into this temporal life, "a certain mean between man and God", "a line connecting man to his Creator". (The phrases are those of Calvin and P E Hughes respectively.) Every man has a conscience, even total pagans. In each case the conscience is a potential ally, a fifth columnist, in the war to recapture the souls oflost men and women. Thanks be to God for the conscience!

Gary Brady BA is the minister of Childs Hill Baptist Church, London